Search Results

Keyword search: Letter to the Editors

On March 11, the New Hampshire House Environment and Agriculture Committee voted to kill HB 152, which would have prohibited the sale and use of adhesive-based rodent traps, commonly called glue traps. The committee disregarded the hundreds of citizens who urged them to pass this bill. They didn’t care about the obscene cruelty of these traps, that the animals stuck in the glue die slowly, in agonizing pain, from starvation dehydration or suffocation. They dismissed the many more humane, non-chemical options available for rodent control. They ignored the advice of the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department that glue traps should be avoided. They disregarded testimony from wildlife rehabilitation professionals about the non-target animals often captured in glue traps, including squirrels, chipmunks, rabbits, skunks, bats, songbirds, snakes, salamanders, toads, turtles, frogs and even kittens and puppies. They scoffed at the many New Hampshire Statutes and Administrative rules that contradict the use of glue traps, such as RSA 206-19:B, which states that any person who causes a wild animal, fish or wild bird to be tortured or mutilated, either purposely or negligently, is guilty of a Class B felony or a misdemeanor respectively. The members of the committee who voted against HB 152 are: Representatives Judy Aron, Barbara Comtois, Catherine Kenny, Seth King, Laurence Miner, Kevin Scully, Kelley Potenza, Liz Barbour and Lisa Freeman. If you care about animals, please contact these legislators and tell them that torturing and mutilating animals is not acceptable in our state.

Three decades ago, the newly independent country of Ukraine was briefly the third-largest nuclear power in the world. Thousands of nuclear arms had been left in Ukraine by Moscow after the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. Eventually, Ukraine made the decision to completely denuclearize. In exchange, the U.S., the U.K. and Russia would guarantee Ukraine’s security in the Budapest Memorandum. Ukraine was told at the time that the Western powers — certainly at least the United States and Great Britain — take their political commitments very seriously. This was a document signed at the highest level by the heads of state. The implication was Ukraine would not be left to stand alone to face a threat should it come under one. But treaties, agreements, promises, handshakes mean nothing to #47 (who never served): Those are for losers and suckers, even if their violation means destroying the underpinnings of an albeit imperfect world order that kept a modicum of peace, at least in the West. And we can always argue about who really started the war in Ukraine! Instead of a shining city on a hill for all the world to see, America is revealed as a fair-weather friend, never to be trusted again. Oh, and even if you think we’ve sacrificed enough of our “blood and treasure” for a bunch of ingrates, why would any country or state now engage in nuclear disarmament or not want to become a nuclear power?

Since the circus came to the White House, there are so many things happening I can’t keep track. A car show in the front driveway with only one vendor there. I wonder what the other car manufacturers thought about being left out. They’ve been engineering cars and trucks, retooling factories and building battery manufacturing facilities. Why were they left out? Aren’t they also great companies with smart people? I guess not. One question that keeps coming back to me and hasn’t been in the news recently is: What happened to TikTok? Both branches of the legislature passed bi-partisan legislation calling for TikTok to be shut down due to national security concerns. TikTok fought it all the way to the Supreme Court and the court upheld the law agreeing it was in the national interest to remove TikTok. In February, for about 6-8 hours, TikTok went dark. However, through an executive order, it was brought back for 30 days so the “smartest man” on the planet could find a buyer. I haven’t heard if there’s a buyer or even an interested party. 30 days have passed — shouldn’t the law be upheld? This is another example of President Trump thumbing his nose at the other co-equal branches of our government.

Welcome to Trump’s Amerikkka: Experience racism, inequality, hate and violence at your leisure. Fascism is not being called for what it is, but you, too, will have a chance to experience it firsthand. Don’t ask for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for you, your children, your grandchildren and generations to come. The question becomes what we would like to see rise from the ashes.

It’s easy to overlook the importance of Medicaid until you or someone you love needs it. For our family, Medicaid is essential for our physical, emotional and financial well-being. One of our twin sons was diagnosed in utero with a congenital heart defect, which has led to numerous medical and developmental challenges. Without Medicaid, he would be severely limited in the amount of speech, occupational and physical therapy he could receive. Private insurance only covers a fraction of what he needs. Medicaid ensures that he can see all 14 of his specialists at Boston Children’s Hospital without us having to worry about sacrificing the best care for financial reasons. It covers necessary testing, surgeries and procedures that help keep him stable. Recently, the company I had been working at for over 10 years closed, leaving us reliant on my husband’s insurance. As his employer is a small company with limited coverage options, the costs are unaffordable. I have been searching for work, but it is nearly impossible to find a job that allows me to care for our one child’s medical and developmental needs. If we lost Medicaid for our medically complex child, we would be financially devastated — or worse, forced to sacrifice his health. Families like ours should not have to fight to keep the care that allows our children to survive and thrive. I urge policymakers to protect Medicaid and recognize its life-changing impact.

Stop, stop, stop — this has to stop! The president is trying to dumb down the nation by essentially blackmailing educational institutions at all levels if they do not comply with his orders. His latest targets are the Department of Education and the Institute of Museum and Library Services. The benefit of cutting programs is nil, nada, nothing. In New Hampshire, the IMLS survives with federal funding for the InterLibraryLoan services. We need this program to educate readers all over the state. Programs for the blind and disabled are being targeted. We are not a nation of white Christian men and their dependents. The United States is a multi-ethnic, multicultural country that thrives on diversity and welcomes all peoples. The courts, Congress and the legislature need to uphold our freedoms. And the people must speak out and protest!

As the State House crawls with controversy over parental rights, I, a state representative, am going to be faced with a vote that you might help me with: Which mom goes to jail for egregious child abuse? Here are two real-time scenarios going on in this country, with details slightly altered to protect the innocent. One mother decides that her two sons, ages 4 and 1, are actually daughters and begins to display them as daughters. As she’s a lawyer, and as the young men grow to adapt to the role the mother assigned and to become the best young women they can be, she forces the district to acknowledge her choice as “current science and mandated practice.” The other mother is told by her concerned neighbor that her fourteen-year-old daughter “identifies” as a boy. When asked, the daughter says she’s gone confused to counselors and health teachers at school who taught her that this was normal and that she could be whatever she chose. The mother called the school to complain that her daughter had been “groomed” and to ask why no one had called her. She prepared to find a lawyer to pursue a lawsuit. The lawyer whose two sons were daughters refused to take the case. Is either mom in this scenario an abuser worthy of loss of custody and imprisonment? You decide. Thank you in advance. And, if it really matters anymore, predict each child’s future. This is the 21st century.

If you voted for President Donald Trump: Are you having second thoughts about some of his policies and/or Elon Musk’s DOGE? Did you vote for cutting off large chunks of staff and programs serving our veterans, disabled Americans, the poor, cancer and Alzheimer’s research, school lunch programs, IRS personnel seeking tax-cheaters and simply responding to calls for help, air traffic controllers, 83% of the USAID life-sustaining food and health work around the globe or 50% of our Dept. of Education?

Trump delivered Ukraine to Putin, whose invasion caused the worst European military crisis since WWII. Trump’s capitulation shows an eager-to-please Trump blessing everything Putin. Trump’s bizarre claim that Ukraine started the war makes as much sense as saying Ukrainians have brazenly placed their country in the path of Putin’s innocent bombs.

Last year, 68 so-called “Republicans” voted with 152 Democrats to pass HB 1291. Fortunately, we knew who they were because it was a roll call vote. Thankfully, one senator killed the bill when it crossed over. On March 13, “Republican” anarchists pushed through a number of damaging House bills on voice votes. Is there any state representative who, as an “unapologetic Republican,” would ever have the guts to remove these horrific bills from the consent calendar, speak against them and demand a roll call? Or are they just going to allow themselves to be steamrolled?

Gov. Ayotte plans to rein in spending by instituting a work requirement for persons receiving Medicaid. The New Hampshire Senate promoted her plans when it passed SB134 on party lines, 16-8, on March 6. The idea is as old as the Poor Law of Queen Elizabeth I and is found most recently in the Trump-MAGA playbook, Project 2025. In 2019, New Hampshire attempted a Medicaid work requirement only to have Gov. Sununu end it after spending $130,000 because it proved to be onerous and difficult to implement. A court order closed a similar program in Arkansas in 2018.

“Hide under your desks.” Directions given to students in 1950s air raid drills seem to be our Democratic senators’ response to MAGA bullying and menacing. Their support of the Continuing Resolution (H.R. 10545) passed under House Majority Leader Mike Johnson legitimized cruelty and destruction straight out of Project 2025. By voting with the MAGA House majority, Senators Shaheen and Hassan signaled approval of activity that would transfer Social Security and Medicaid dollars to plutocrats who pay no taxes — and eventually the funding of Medicare — from accounts we built with money taken from our paychecks. For many retirees and disabled people, that’s a death sentence, as even those of us who planned ahead rely on Social Security to meet basic expenses. Without Medicare or Medicaid, we cannot afford even basic medical care. For all their talk about veterans, our senators approved deconstructing the Veterans Administration at a time when many vets need extra services. No excuse is adequate in the face of capitulation to the party of greed, grift and despotism. Only fear explains their votes. Neither party stands up for us at the moment. It’s time for “good trouble,” as John Lewis would say. Attend a rally on April 5. Pick a topic: education, veteran’s affairs, Social Security, health care, environment, science, national security or any other one under attack. Resist! Our senators betrayed us. We have to defend ourselves. The cavalry isn’t coming.

Long ago, we should have gotten rid of these hordes coming across our borders. A million of these ne’er-do-wells – French Canadians, mostly Catholic – poured into New Hampshire and New England in the late 1800s. Sure, we needed them for cheap labor, but we failed to recognize them, as the New York Times did at the time, as “ignorant and unenterprising, subservient to the most bigoted of Catholic priests [and] caring nothing for our free institutions, civil or religious liberty or the benefits of education.” And we failed to see this Canadian invasion — again, as the Times saw — as a planned effort to create a “New France” as “part of a priestly scheme, fervently fostered in Canada, to bring New England under the control of the Roman Catholic faith.” This was seen as “the avowed purpose of the secret society to which every adult French Canadian belongs.” An invasion a generation earlier brought several million Irish Catholics to New England to fill labor needs. Their shortcomings, too, were clearly labeled: “stupid, apelike, lazy, drunks, criminals, takers…” Their depravity and Catholicism were seen as threats to American nativist culture. As foreseen, the descendants of these hordes have taken over New Hampshire; but unpredictably, they became property owners, entrepreneurs, civic leaders and civil servants. In fact, our governor is a hybrid product of these hordes, a genuine Irish-French Canadian Catholic. What surprises me is her decision to cooperate with Donald Trump’s mass deportation and turn a blind eye on the experiences of her ancestors.

I recently attended public committee hearings at the Legislative Building in Concord on some bills being considered for a vote in the New Hampshire House of Representatives. While waiting for my turn to be called to testify before the committee, I noticed several out-of-state people being called to testify before me. This was infuriating. I asked Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Chairman MacDonald why out-of-state people were being allowed to testify before the committee before me. His response was that there were no rules as to who gets to testify before anyone. This is outrageous. I do not understand why people from out of state are allowed to come into our state to testify and influence our legislature anyway. To me, it’s akin to voting in a state in which you don’t reside. I can understand having an expert in a certain field be allowed to come in from out of state to testify about a bill, but these people were not experts. They were out-of-staters who didn’t like freedom and diversity and who came to New Hampshire to influence our legislators. This should not be allowed.

In 1939, the Nazis kicked off their purge of “undesirables” by tracking down and murdering people with disabilities. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has a page devoted to this disturbing history (hopefully this page will not be scrubbed like so many other government web pages have in recent days). It therefore troubles me greatly that a powerful man, who has eugenicist leanings and publicly performs SiegHeil salutes, has gained access to my disabled loved ones’ medical records and knows where they live. There are good reasons why the Social Security Administration is supposed to adhere to the Privacy Act of 1974, which guarantees participating individuals “the right to be protected against unwarranted invasion of their privacy.” We should all be demanding more information on why a billionaire is being allowed, by our own government, to trample on this right. This may sound paranoid but the actions of the current administration make me increasingly uneasy about the path that our nation is on in terms of caring for our most vulnerable citizens.

Whew! Thank you Chief Justice John Roberts! President Trump’s rant, which reads like he’s a sociopathic mob boss rather than the president of the United States, is yet another embarrassing, cringe-worthy display of who some of you elected to be the leader of our nation. Is there no end to Trump’s destruction of everything we stand for? I’m tired of bumping into friends who are depressed, who feel powerless, who won’t watch or listen to the news, who feel the weight of this negative energy cast upon us daily by a dysfunctional, personality-disordered leader. I am more than tired of it… of him. So I’m asking, where are you, Democrats? Where are our leaders, past and present, who are allowing this to occur? Why aren’t you speaking out? Where are you?

Making our billionaires into trillionaires. Making our most needy more needy, more hungry, more homeless and less healthy. Please tell me when and in what universe did such policies make America great.

Why is everyone so shocked at the devastation being wrought on federal services? This is exactly what many experts and letters to this newspaper and others tried to warn about: Project 2025! They’re getting rid of credentialed, honest, experienced civil servants (yes, that title applies to those being dropped) who will eventually be replaced with people groomed by the Heritage Foundation to be Trump sycophants, regardless of whether that would violate Congressional authority or our Constitution.

The treatment of President Zelensky in the Oval Office and the “pause” in U.S. military assistance and military intelligence to the Ukrainians is immoral! The fact is that Ukraine is fighting for its very existence against a brutal enemy led by a dictator. Our moral compass has disappeared, and this causing death in Ukraine and giving Russia the advantage in any negotiations. This is a shameful demonstration of how not to lead the free world, and it is making us less safe from those who wish harm to the United States! This is no way to show that we value individual freedoms and the safety of people under attack from a vicious bully.