State Representative Mike Moffett (R-Loudon) is a retired professor who chairs the House Committee on State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs.

Over three years ago our New Hampshire Education Commissioner stopped me at the State House, just outside Representatives Hall.

“You should sue!” he counseled.

“Why?”

“Didn’t you see that Union Leader opinion piece today?”

I quickly found out that I was featured on a purported white supremacist list, which also included the commissioner, in a screed written by a Granite State gadfly upset by our well-founded concerns about the pernicious effects of teaching critical race theory (CRT).

(Gadfly: noun, “An annoying person, especially one who provokes others into action by criticism.”)

But as public figures, defamation suits against libelous writers weren’t realistic options for us. We ourselves chose to swim in ponds full of snapping turtles. And as a First Amendment advocate who blogs, writes op-eds, authors sports columns, and loves Facebook comments, I understood the consequences for taking public positions on important issues.

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Casella Waste Systems’ landfill project in New Hampshire’s North Country denied permit

‘Less finger pointing, more communication’: Longtime Chichester residents share hopes before second town meeting

‘The revenue just isn’t there’: House Finance Committee slashes $271M in jobs, services from Ayotte’s budget proposal

12 Concord student-athletes sign on to play at the collegiate level

‘There was no oversight’: NH child advocate has been a watchdog for children's care. Now, the office is on the chopping block

Volunteer group wants to help homeless clean up their camp

Your Daily Puzzles

Cross|Word

Flipart

Typeshift

SpellTower

Really Bad Chess

Earlier this month, while campaigning before the state primary elections, I encountered literature all over my district portraying me as a scoundrel because I supported a law to improve our Right to Know procedures. My head shot was super-imposed over someone else’s body and there I was at a table with some fat cat pushing a pile of currency at me. And the out-of-state money funding the effort came via my red team!

The blue team now likely awaits to fire more shots my way as the November elections near.

Despite it all, I was again my district’s top primary vote-getter. Thank you, Canterbury and Loudon citizens. Nasty hit pieces often reveal more about authors than targets.

Freedom of speech means all speech. Majestic and mean. Inspiring and ignorant. Loving and libelous.

Anyway, the great 2021 CRT caper was recently back in the news. It turns out that another target of the gadfly actually did bring a defamation lawsuit against both him and the Union Leader. It went to the N.H. Supreme Court. I had no idea.

(Note: The Concord Monitor also printed the 2021 screed but prudently removed the names that the Union Leader included.)

Assisted by a pro bono attorney, he finally prevailed in court and recently took a victory lap with a Monitor piece claiming vindication after being stressed out by the lawsuit for several years. While the gadfly erred in the way he authored his 2021 screed, he’s absolutely correct about our First Amendment and America’s wonderful speech freedoms.

Those freedoms are not only denied to those living under communism, Islamofascism, or certain university administrations, but also to those living in most other western democracies. To cite one of countless examples, a French court recently convicted two men for “contempt” for merely defacing an effigy of President Macron during a peaceful protest.

Such restrictions on free expression are de rigueur throughout most democracies. Attempts to curb “hate speech” anywhere inevitably lead to those proverbial slippery slopes marked by inconsistencies in application with chilling effects on the free expression Americans take for granted.

The First Amendment is first for a reason. Let gadflies be judged in the courts of public opinion as opposed to courts of law.

That said, the First Amendment also allows for them to apologize if they can acknowledge hubris and poor judgment. As Raajesh Pillai said, “The first to apologize is the bravest. The first to forgive is the strongest. The first to forget is the happiest.”

And as Silence Dogood (Ben Franklin pseudonym) once wrote, “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.”